Call for immediate advice

(416) 630-8702

Donna V. Pledge, Toronto Criminal Lawyer

Barrister & Solicitor B.A. LL.B.
Browsing Posts in

Recent Successes



Lorem Ipsum

Donec a volutpat ex. Duis consectetur libero turpis, dignissim fringilla libero lacinia in. Sed ipsum nunc, fringilla ut orci ut, tempor eleifend ligula. Fusce ut ultricies sem. Ut lacinia orci a pulvinar rutrum. Vivamus elementum fermentum nisi, et rhoncus lacus tempor vel. Donec quis est at ante feugiat vulputate. Nulla mauris elit, porta at convallis at, suscipit sed turpis. Vivamus sollicitudin tempus sem, ac euismod diam malesuada et. Vestibulum cursus, arcu sed elementum blandit, sapien eros aliquam dui, a consectetur quam lorem in mauris. Suspendisse rutrum iaculis dapibus. Proin eu leo a nibh vulputate fermentum eu id metus. Quisque interdum massa eget lorem rhoncus consequat non sit amet nulla.

Praesent dapibus accumsan euismod. Etiam condimentum erat nulla. Fusce in placerat ex, at rutrum tellus. Donec semper odio nec nisi tincidunt laoreet. Sed sit amet purus lacus. Sed mollis euismod metus ac feugiat. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Etiam ut ultricies eros. Proin faucibus purus at risus auctor, eget mollis leo aliquet. Quisque laoreet massa porttitor eleifend consectetur. In hac habitasse platea dictumst. Curabitur ullamcorper, orci vel consectetur mattis, odio diam rutrum lacus, imperdiet facilisis nisi magna et neque.

Z.W.C.- Charged with Impaired Driving, Driving Under the Influence, and Refusal to Provide a Breath Sample.

Z.W.C.- Client was charged with Impaired Driving, Driving with Over 80mgs of alcohol in 100mls of blood and Refuse to Provide a Breath Sample. Several charter applications were filed and as a result the crown withdrew the Driving with Over 80mgs of alcohol in 100mls of blood and Refuse to Provide Breath Sample charges. The Impaired Driving charge proceeded to trial, wherein the charge was dismissed after the Judge was convinced that there was a reasonable doubt as to whether or not my client was Impaired.

W.Y.W.- Charged with Driving Under the Influence.

W.Y.W.- My client was charged with Driving with Over 80mgs of alcohol in 100mls of blood. On the day of trial the crown requested an adjournment on the basis that one of their police witnesses was not available. The adjournment application was opposed. The Judge denied the adjournment and as a result the crown withdrew the charge.

Z.P.L.- Charged with Possession of Instruments Used in the Making of Fraudulent Credit Cards and Fraudulent use of Credit Card Data.

Z.P.L.- Client was charged with Possession of Instruments Used in the Making of Fraudulent Credit Cards and Fraudulent use of Credit Card Data. The matter proceeded to trial, and after successful cross examination of the police witnesses the charges were dismissed.

A.B.- Charged With Assault.

.A.B.- Client was charged with Assault. The matter proceeded to trial, wherein the charge was dismissed after successful cross examination of the complainant.

A.B.- Charged with Assault.

A.B.- Client was charged with Assault. The matter proceeded to trial, wherein the charge was dismissed after successful cross examination of the complainant.

S.A.- Charged with Driving Under the Influence.

S.A.- Client was charged with Driving with Over 80mgs of alcohol in 100mls of blood. An unreasonable search and seizure application was filed on the basis that the demand that the officer read the client was unlawful, and as a result the crown withdrew the charge in advance of the trial.

Z.Z.- Charged with Two Counts of Assault and One Count of Assault With a Weapon

Z.Z.- My client was charged with two counts of assault and one count of Assault with a weapon. The matter proceeded to trial. All charges were dismissed after trial because the complainant was determined to be incredible after cross examination of her.

P.M.- Charged with Refusing to Provide a Breath Sample.

P.M.- Client was charged with Refusing to Provide a Breath Sample. The crown was convinced that their chances of winning were very low and as a result the charge was withdrawn.

A.L.- Charged with Sexual Assault.

A.L.- Client was charged with sexual assault. The matter was withdrawn on the day of trial because the crown was convinced that the complainant’s testimony did not make any sense.

Donna V. Pledge, Toronto Criminal Lawyer